All Work Mac Security UX Redesign · Account
4 Core screens redesigned

Intego — Account Redesign

Intego users rely on their account to feel safe and in control. This case study shows how clearer hierarchy and action visibility helped users quickly understand their status and what to do next — without searching or interpreting.

Role
Product Designer
Year
2025
Team
1 PM, 2 Designers, 1 Dev
Tools
Figma

Helping users feel safe at a glance

Intego is a Mac security product. Users rely on their account to feel safe and in control — but the existing experience made it hard to understand what mattered most. Everything had similar visual weight, protection status wasn't clear, and key actions were easy to miss.

I led the redesign of the account experience across the dashboard, devices, and billing areas. My focus was on clarifying priorities, improving hierarchy, and making key actions easier to find.

Intego account redesign — overview of new screens
Redesigned account experience — dashboard, devices, subscriptions, and my account

No clear hierarchy, no clear confidence

The account experience didn't help users understand what mattered most. Everything had similar visual weight, protection status wasn't clear, and key actions were easy to miss.

All sections were presented with equal visual weight — making it hard to know where to start.
Important actions were embedded inside dense layouts and easy to miss while scanning.
Users had to search across sections to confirm whether they were protected.
These issues pointed to hierarchy and scannability problems — not missing features.

Understanding users before redesigning their experience

Before redesigning the account experience, I focused on understanding three things: who the users are, what they expect from a security product, and where the current experience breaks down. I worked with two existing research sources and conducted a heuristic evaluation.

Looking across the existing personas, a clear pattern stood out: users did not see themselves as security experts and expected the product to handle protection reliably in the background. They relied on automation and external signals to feel protected, rather than checking settings or understanding technical details.

Cautious Retiree persona
Cautious Retiree
Mac user who wants to feel protected without managing settings
"I double up on security by using Avast & Malwarebytes too."
Security mindset: "I trust real-time scanning to always run and protect me."
Status understanding: "I don't understand the red dot in the menu bar."

What this meant for the account experience:

Users needed clear confirmation that protection is active.
Status had to be easy to understand at a glance.
The account should reduce interpretation, not add it.

I reviewed competitor web account dashboards to understand how protection status and next actions are handled in this category. In both Malwarebytes and Kaspersky, protection status is shown immediately on entry — users don't need to scan the page or interpret secondary indicators.

Malwarebytes account dashboard — protection status visible immediately
Malwarebytes — status visible immediately on entry
Competitor account dashboard — protection status and primary actions
Competitor — primary actions placed next to status
In security products, clarity of status and priorities is a baseline expectation — not a design preference.

From patterns to design decisions

While each screen revealed different usability issues, several patterns repeated across the experience. These patterns informed the insights and UI decisions below.

01
First impression defines trust
Insight: Users judge security by what they see first.
Design approach: Prioritise reassurance before features.
UI decision: Protection status and plan summary are the first elements visible on entry.
02
Clear status builds confidence
Insight: When protection status isn't clear, trust drops — even if protection is active.
Design approach: Remove any need for interpretation.
UI decision: Use explicit status text ("Active") instead of relying on visual cues alone.
03
Less choice, less friction
Insight: Clear priorities reduce anxiety and decision effort.
Design approach: Limit choices and guide action.
UI decision: Each section highlights one primary action; secondary actions are visually de-emphasised.
04
Placement beats explanation
Insight: Users scan, not read — content placement is more powerful than copy volume.
Design approach: Group related information spatially.
UI decision: Key information is grouped in one place; coverage and plan status are immediately visible on each screen.

Account experience — screen by screen

Overview / Dashboard

From the research, it was clear that users often open the account just to make sure everything is working. The goal of this screen was to answer that question immediately and reduce the need to search or interpret information.

Before: the dashboard presented all sections with equal weight. Users had to scan the page to understand whether they were protected or what to do next.
After: protection status and next actions are immediately visible.

Dashboard before redesign
Before — equal weight, no clear status
Dashboard after redesign — protection status visible immediately
After — protection status visible immediately, primary actions easy to spot
Devices

Users expect the account to clearly show what's protected and what still needs attention. The previous device list was hard to scan and focused on technical details instead of coverage clarity.

Before: users struggled to understand coverage at a glance.
After: the new layout focuses on recognition, coverage clarity, and a clear next step per device.

Devices screen before redesign
Before — technical details, hard to scan
Devices screen after redesign — coverage clear, one action per device
After — coverage clear, one clear next action per device
Subscriptions

This screen is about reassurance, not exploration. Users want to understand their plan status quickly and confidently.

Before: subscription details were presented in dense blocks of text. Plan status and actions were easy to miss.
After: plans are clearly separated by state, with one primary action per plan.

Subscriptions before redesign
Before — dense text, status easy to miss
Subscriptions after redesign — plan status clearly labeled, active and expired separated
After — plan status clearly labelled, active and expired plans separated
My Account

This screen contains sensitive information, so the focus was on reducing friction and making changes feel safe.

Before: account details were fragmented across sections. Users had to search to update basic information.
After: information is grouped logically and editable fields are easy to find.

My Account before redesign
Before — fragmented sections, hard to navigate
My Account after redesign — information grouped, editable fields clearly marked
After — information grouped by type, editable fields clearly marked

A more confident, less demanding account

User Impact

The biggest change was how confident the account feels. Users can immediately see their protection status, plan, and whether any action is needed — without searching or scanning. The account became easier to read, more predictable, and much less mentally demanding.

Product Impact

Clearer structure reduced confusion around protection and plan status, made upgrade and renewal moments easier to understand, and created a more flexible account foundation for future features.

What I Learned
In security products, my role as a designer is to remove decisions and interpretation — especially when safety is at stake. Users may say they want control, but when they open their account, they're really looking for reassurance. The account's job isn't to offer more control; it's to clearly show that everything is already handled.

Note: I left the company before launch, so post-launch metrics were not available.

Next Case Study

PIA — Design System

View Case Study